Summary

In a Fox News interview, Donald Trump argued that Ukraine should not have resisted Russia’s 2022 invasion, claiming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy should have made a deal with Vladimir Putin.

Trump criticized Zelenskyy for choosing to fight, compared the military strength of Russia and Ukraine, and said he could have ended the war quickly through negotiations.

Trump’s stance contrasts with Joe Biden’s strong support for Ukraine, including aid and sanctions on Russia.

  • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t imagine what would have satisfied Russia other than complete surrender. Ukraine had few other options than to fight. Uphill as their battle may have been.

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    You might not believe me but anyone can just walk into maralargo. Trump won’t have you trespassed, he will offer you a cash deal to leave. Trust me, it’s true. Ez money.

    • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is why he’s having such a hard time getting Musk to leave. How do you make a problem go away when your only problem solving skill is bribery and your problem is a higher degree of wealth than your bribing power?

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    OTOH, I also heard him quoted trying to get Saudi Arabia to flood the market with cheap oil to try and force Russia to the table. Makes sense, since oil has been the last big export Russia has to make money on. I’m opposed to Trump and his stupid fucking Nazi pals on pretty much everything, but I guess even broken clocks can be right twice a day. It’d be nice to see this meat grinder closed down with a treaty, instead of the US deciding to do a rugpull on Ukraine. Ofc, I support the Ukrainian people’s right to self determination. If they want to keep fighting, that’s their right, but putting Russia on an economic back foot would probably meaningfully help negotiations.

    Source (didn’t read, heard about it on NPR)

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/23/oil-turns-lower-after-trump-says-hell-ask-saudi-arabia-and-opec-to-bring-the-price-down.html

    • notastatist@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      But this just makes sense if russia would be sanktioned before. Because if russia wouldnt have started a war, russia could still sell and buy everything. So if the oil price dumps there wont be the same effect as now.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Aren’t the Biden era sanctions still active? IIRC, sketchy off grid oil sales and sales to India/China are basically what’s keeping Russia going at this point. If the market gets flooded with cheap OPEC oil, that would be a major baseball bat to the knee.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ugh. I guess it’s starting. Anyone placing bets on how long before Trump does a complete about-face on the situation and starts running joint missions with Russia against Ukraine? I’m morbidly suspicious that might really be how things end up.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      This isn’t exactly a secret. Remember in the debate when he said he’d end the war, and refused to say which side he’d be on?

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Donald Trump argued that Ukraine should not have resisted Russia’s 2022 invasion

    *Trump was an idiot as usual, arguing (…)

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why would he say something so easily disproven at this point? If Ukraine should not have fought back they would have been defeated already.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is literally all the “anti war” arguments. George Washington should have just stopped resisting the red coats.

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Washington was part of a revolution. This is an invasion. More like Russia should have just let Napoleon have it.

        • EvilBit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Fair enough. How about this?

          It’s like letting the SCARY EVIL (mysteriously suddenly nonexistent) IMMIGRANT MEXICAN CARAVAN INVADERS just come in and have the US.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why people keep listening to what that being says? Just respond to his actions, anthing else is useless…

    • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why people keep listening to what that being turd says? Just respond to his actions, anthing else is useless…

      ftfy

    • IsoSpandy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      That being controls almost 50% of the world’s nuclear arsenal. That’s why.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Our President. By election. He isn’t wanted by many, and is definitely no leader.

  • DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    So Ukraine, hear me out… Eliminate Trump and Putin during the negotiations, blame it on someone else. Everyone will thank you, and we’ll get over it.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sure at this point if Zelenskyy pulled out a wellrod, popped both of them and said “Slava Ukraini” there would be a round of applause.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It would almost certainly be a requirement to prosecute and then likely lock Zelenskyy up if he did that, even if he might be doing us all a favour. And even the nicest prison is still a prison.

        It would be better if there was a way to have the targets neutralise each other.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Requirement from whom? Who would enforce it?

          I know the obvious answer is the ICC, but they currently have warrants for both Putin and Netanyahu, so clearly that’s not an effective threat.

          • palordrolap@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Straight up killing a known criminal is not the accepted way to mete out justice, no matter how right it seems. We have (international) courts for a reason, even when the case is open and shut, and even if the same courtesy would be unlikely if the situation was reversed.

          • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Vance. I think he and his puppet masters would love the excuse to join with putin’s past allies. Russia gets the land, united states of stupid gets half the resources contracts to aid in building the ‘infrastructure’ and such to process the resources.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        i honestly don’t think anyone would put him to trial. like suddenly everyone you know was with the president of ukraine at the time of the incident. and sure, that’s not what questions the ICC would be asking, but that’s what we’d all be saying

        • DrFistington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Exactly I mean, the USA isn’t going to start a war with an ally over a shitbag placeholder president like Trump. As for Russia they’re already fucking war so what are they going to do? If anything set it up so it looks like a Russian assassination attempt on Z went wrong and got Putin and Trump instead. United States should have been at war with Russia since 2016 anyway. Now would be a great time to join in considering Russian combat capacity is at nearly zero, and they’re currently utilizing the zap branigan meat wave tactic.

          At this point if that actually happened China would take a long hard look and go no thank you sir. They ain’t doing shit to defend Russia. Hell, if we promised them a portion of it, they’d help us take it

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem is who will replace them. Does Putin even have an official successor (like the US VP), or would this create a power vacuum?

      • DrFistington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        So believe it or not back when the USA had its shit together we had this thing called the CIA and boy were they pretty good at identifying and exploiting power vacuums to the advantage of our country.

      • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Prime Minister is de jure the acting president in case of a vacancy. Given the strength of legal institutions in Russia Mikhail Mishustin would have some work ahead of him to actually hold power.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Vance has no political capital like Trump. He doesn’t have a cult he can use to threaten to primary people. Once Trump is gone all of this loses momentum.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Will be interesting to watch the power vacuum when Trump dies. It will be a great opportunity for the democrats to make progress. I’m sure they’ll find a way to fuck that up too.

      • Absaroka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m not sure anybody would rally behind him. He had the lowest likability score of any VP pick since 2000 - even below Sarah “I Can See Russia From My House!” Palin.

        • psmgx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Palin was rocking the MILF vibe and, for better or worse, took her conservative creds mostly seriously.

          Vance is date rapey, nakedly ambitious, and completely owned by Thiel.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’ll have millions/billions of people willing to be your alibi. “According to people calling in, Zelensky was at 300,000 bars, sleeping on 1,250,000 couches, and attending 13 Bar Mitvahs that night, so he couldn’t have killed Trump and Putin.”

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        "Absolutely top-notch guy. Literally omnipresent.

        Like me and all my friends were having individualized, concurrent, and meaningful bottle episodes with the guy.

        Just the consummate gentleman."

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Trump is a malignant narcissist, and I’m pretty sure that’s a requirement to have that opinion.