• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Me: “I’ve got an elaborate folder structure for all my documents.”

    Windows: “You want to put this in the root directory of OneDrive.”

    Me: "No, I want to put it in \SpecialFiles\ProjectName\IterationNo\DetailedSchematic"

    Windows: “Root directory of OneDrive it is.”

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I used the desktop all the time when I was on Windows. When I moved to Linux fulltime, KDE wouldn’t let you save to desktop. Eventually I figured out how to fix that, but by that time I had the habit broken. Thankfully i never reverted and my shit is generally organized because of it.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    8 days ago

    I absolutely do it the other way. Nothing is on my desktop except for the trash bin. There is a shortcut to the file explorer and browser pinned to the task bar. And that’s it.

    • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is nothing at all on my desktop except for a text document created by my girlfriend saying that she loves me that she snuck on there when I wasn’t looking.

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Ah, a person of culture! Though I admit everything that I regularly use is pinned to the taskbar.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Taskbar is all you need. Also, the windows/meta button, then just typing (or if you’re in KDE, literally just typing) the thing I want to do and hitting enter. Fuck desktop icons.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Windows + E for file explorer as well, when you can’t be bothered with the mouse. I wish you were able to pin specific folders to the taskbar, as opposed to just general explorer. I want to save one click.

      • hOrni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I use my keyboard as little as possible, so shortcut keys aren’t for me. I use a laptop, and am usually lying on the couch, too far to reach the keyboard. I have a few shortcuts mapped to my mouse. You’d be surprised how much I can surf the web with just the mouse. And sometimes even with my left hand.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    Microsoft: put it in OneDrive. We will use your content to train our AI models. No really this is fine.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also Microsoft: If you ever try to leave us we will delete all of your data on all of your devices. We might even do it at random just for fun…No, we won’t warn you.

  • sepi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good god. Putting stuff in the desktop is a big yuck. Your desktop probably looks like your room.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d be happy if those apps were asking to save to Documents like in the screenshot. But alas, reality is much more cruel. They always want to save to some vague OneDrive location, and won’t even show you the local file browser without extra steps.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      If yOU dOn’T uSe oNEdrIvE iT is IMpOssiBle to AuTO sAve! The technology just doesn’t exist to save on a timer without involving the cloud!

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Documents, Desktop and Picture folders are just moved from the user folder into the user folder\OneDrive folder.

      Other than that it work exactly the same.

      OneDrive also always has a local folder. Usually in your user folder.

      You can blame a lot on OneDrive, but this isn’t one of them.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        You see, I have OneDrive disabled and set to not sync.

        It still wants me to save to a OneDrive directory, simply because I’m signed into my Microsoft account.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t want any of my files uploaded to OneDrive; therefore I don’t want to save them in the OneDrive folder. I have other folders where I’d like to save my files instead.

        So the behaviour I described is a persistent annoyance for me; despite you telling me it isn’t a problem.

        • RamenJunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t mind OneDrive sync, I like it honestly.

          What I absolutely do not want, is my Desktop on One Drive. For starters, its often a scratch place. I don’t want it instantly pushing 6GB of photos I just pulled off my camera’s memory card to the cloud before I can sorr them.

  • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 days ago

    I am the opposite and I absolutely hate it when I have to work on someone’s laptop with cluttered desktop and folders. Mine only has a taskbar at bottom and clock widget at bottom right corner. All temporary files goes to downloads or to organised directories. What’s the point of having a nice wallpaper if you can’t enjoy it.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m the same way. I will tolerate no icons on my desktop. It’s widgets or nothin’.

      Now, my physical desktop, on the other hand…

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s the point of having a nice wallpaper if you can’t enjoy it.

      That’s what the aecond monitor is for

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You do at least have some shortcuts on your desktop, right?

      Otherwise, why have a desktop?

      You can open a picture if you want to look at it

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Everything from start menu shortcuts. Much cleaner and nicer that way.

        Edit: I am using KDE plasma so not the full screen start menu like in windows but the small box on bottom left with about 15 icons that I regularly use.

      • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        You do at least have some shortcuts on your desktop, right?

        Not OC, but no, that’s what the taskbar is for, I use my iconless desktop as a space to drag windows around and multitask

      • NeatoBuilds@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s what the super key is for, you hit the super key and start typing the name of whatever it is you want and hit enter just like a phone

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Rebuttal, with a physical desk you put things you need right now on top in the open. You wouldn’t grab something off the printer and put it into a drawer first, then reopen the drawer to get it out of your need it now.

      The desktop is “right now” workspace. Why bother to put it into a folder whose only purpose is not to take things out of to put elsewhere? I could at least understand people who download direct to documents… but that still leaves a mess to clean up with installers and such.

      Downloading to the desktop is not only sane, but more efficient.

      Leaving everything on your desktop is a different conversation though.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I definitely would go ahead and put the printed document directly into a hanging file in my desk drawer if I could read/use the document without ever moving it like I can on a computer…

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Somehow I’m doubting that you keep all your computer files in your download folder. You still have to move it. My way just makes it obvious it needs to be filled instead of leaving it on the junk drawer.

          And the physical desk analogy still holds. Yeah you put it in a folder in the drawer, but it’s the wrong one. Unless you are specifying a custom filepath for each file, in which case, carry on.

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Unless you are specifying a custom filepath for each file, in which case, carry on.

            This one is correct. I always setup my browser to ask where to put each download, and then send it to the file it needs to live in. Usually have the “default” be the home folder so I can easily browse to the subsequent folder quickly. The browser doesn’t just get to decide where to put stuff or it would all be a mess eventually anyway.

  • Toribor@corndog.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Microsoft and application developers treat the Documents folder like a total dumping ground for whatever random nonsense they can dream up. No wonder people look elsewhere. Need to store user files? Documents. A database? Documents. Giant cache files? Documents. Config? Documents. Executables? Fuck it put those in Documents too.

    Why would I ever store my real documents in a folder so littered with shit that I can never find anything? It’s not like the search actually works.

    Also as a Linux user myself and to head off any smugness, developers do the same thing with the home directory so users end up inventing weird ways to stay organized.

    • RamenJunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have my files meticulously organized in hierarchical folders that sync across all my devices through One Drive and to my NAS through One Drive.

      I hate that Microsoft wants to dump everything in Documents.

      Also, for SOME FUCKING REASON, my work system, wants to put everything into the root of One Drive. Like fuck please put it in Documents at least. I don’t want ANYTHING in the root folder if I can avoid it, aside from maybe the occasional super special thing.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t ever search for files/folders in explorer’s browser anymore. I just use Everything and TreeSize at this point. Windows’ search function is pointless.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Everything downloads to the desktop, that way it’s in my face so I have to deal with it.

    The clutter on the desktop annoys me into cleaning it up, but I’ll ignore a downloads folder once I’ve grabbed whatever I just downloaded.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      you are the first person i’ve know to also do this! it really does help

      • count_duckula@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I do this too. I do not like anything on my Desktop, but I download files to there, which forces me to deal with them. Interestingly enough, my Downloads directory is a barren wasteland.

    • 474D@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      But… You can just download things to their deserved spot in the first place?? Why the extra step

      • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Desktop is my temp space. There are files with a very limited shelf live (logs I downloaded to search something, screenshots, …) so I have to clean them up on a regular base before my desktop becomes too crowded and I get annoyed.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lot of stuff don’t have a spot. And no, I’m not putting that meme template I will need for 5 minutes into the tmp folder, I’m not insane.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That requires effort up-front every time I click download.

        I’d rather just click ‘download’ and let it go to an easy to find default location. The desktop means I won’t just forget about it for months. It may sit there for a day or two, but it definitely won’t get ignored the way a folder I rarely look at does; because the clutter right in my face annoys me into cleaning it up.

        Working around/against my own procrastination.

  • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    The cursed Linux alternative of this is usually putting things directly in the home folder – I used to do this until I got better. Desktop is simple to keep clean when you don’t have one in your “desktop environment” by default.

    Some people who’ve used MacOs before OSX dump everything to the root filesystem out of habit. It works just as poorly as a file management strategy as one might expect, albeit better than putting everything on the desktop. Not sure how often that happens but I’ve known multiple people to do that.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      For some reason I hate the idea of just dropping everything in the Home folder, yet Downloads just ends up becoming exactly that anyway lol

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use downloads instead, it mainly functions as a temporary folder where anything unimportant can live and once it gets a scroll bar it all gets deleted. For the very rare things that are important I could then move them after.

      • SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well first off, through God Linux, all things are possible. You can have multiple hard links to a file, where a given hard link is deleted, but you can still manipulate the file through any other other links. Alternately, you can open a file, and while you have a valid open file descriptor, delete the file. The file descriptor is still valid until you close the file though, so you can still save (thus move) it to a new location.

        Windows locks files when you open them, preventing these kinds of shenanigans.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love GNOME for this. No desktop icons. Windows/super key, type the first letter or two, boom. It’s so pretty.

    My phone on the other hand? The first screen is nicely arranged. The second screen is just a chronological list of the apps I’ve downloaded, because they automatically go to desktop, and they’ll clutter up my home screen if I don’t have a separate sacrificial screen for them

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Same. I hate desktop clutter. The horrors I’ve seen when I’ve been on someone else’s PC. Random desktop documents that haven’t been touched in 5 years. Why?!

      Even aside from looking ugly, it’s not even a good place for apps/files! If you have a window or two open, everything is obscured and you have to move windows out of the way to access your stuff.

      They get a lot of shit for it, but IMO Gnome was 100% right to say “No. The desktop inevitably becomes a dumping ground and we don’t want that. Your app menu is for apps and your Home folder is for files. We have very good search functionality to find what you want. No desktop icons. If you want that, install an extension.”

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        The availability of extensions for everything is the true power of Gnome for me. They got most things right but I love being able to tweak every little detail to my exact liking

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          “We” is obviously the hard-working developers who predominantly work on Gnome unpaid. The people who provide the software for free.

          To be completely honest, I’m not sure how you don’t know who “we” is in that context. When the devs of a project say “we”, who do you think they’re referring to, the Jackson 5?

          Literally every project makes decisions on what their vision is and enacts it. Gnome is no different.

          If you don’t like a piece of software, don’t use it. Nobody is forcing you to use it.

          Frankly, you sound entitled. They aren’t obliged to make their project to the way you want it. Especially not when you’re getting it for free. Entitlement like that is the biggest cancer in the FOSS community, IMO.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Hmm, GNOME pays developers. There’s a team of full time employees steering GNOME, and staff. Sure they are a non-profit, but it’s a bit romanticizing to claim that they are doing all that work for free. I don’t think it is very nice or productive to call people names and gatekeeping FOSS this way. There’s such a thing as customization. It’s fine that GNOME is very opinionated (everyone accepts that they are and the project lead has said so time and time again that user choice is not part of their focus). But, at the same time, it’s not their project, there’s a complex governance structure that involves the community. It’s contradictory to speak this way about a component of a Linux distro. Linux is philosophically underlined by freedom of choice and personal customization, and it’s inappropriate to insult people for wanting some more of that.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              No, no, no, no.

              Some developers do some paid work. The vast majority is unpaid. I’m not sure where you heard that, but that information is incorrect.

              And I never said they did all of the work for free, I said predominantly. Same goes for other projects.

              Please don’t try to twist my words, I feel I was very clear with them.

              Yes, it is their project. They own it. It’s theirs. They are the developers.

              Linux is philosophically underlined by freedom of choice and personal customization

              And Gnome doesn’t go against any of that. You are free to not use it. They aren’t forcing you. You are free to customise it. They aren’t stopping you.

              Please stop acting so entitled. This is software they are providing for free, the bulk of the work being unpaid. They don’t have to do free work for your specific needs if they don’t want to. It’s their project.

              I never insulted you. If my words hurt, then I’m sorry, my intention is not to hurt you.

              I’m just trying to steer you away from the path you’re on of thinking you’re entitled to XYZ and some predominantly unpaid devs have to cater to your whims. They do not. It’s their project, not yours, and they rightly call the shots.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Sure, all those things could be argued to some degree or another. Just don’t call people cancer. Throwing insults devalues your argument.

                • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I never called you cancer, or insulted you.

                  See:

                  Entitlement like that is the biggest cancer in the FOSS community, IMO.

                  I said feeling like the devs owe you something is entitlement, which is a cancer to the FOSS world. You aren’t owed anything, and neither am I.

                  Nowhere did I say you were cancer, unless you happen to proudly identify as an extremely entitled person.

                  Like I said, sorry if my words hurt you, but you aren’t entitled to have the devs carer to you specifically. The project is theirs and if you don’t like it, fork it or use something else. That’s what FOSS is all about.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is actually the one thing I hate about GNOME. I keep a nearly fully empty desktop but I like having one as sort of a staging ground for temp files. I like just being able to chuck a file there and then drag it into another program, all without having nautilus open

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah, desktop as the temp location is great for a few reasons.

        I can easily see what is in the queue.

        It reminds me to do something about it.

        I can rearrange the dozen or so icons for fun when I am having trouble picking what to do. Kind of like inventory management in an rpg.

        When I hit about 15 it prompts me to clear the list by either finishing them or putting them all away so I can start again with a clear screen.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Iirc, there’s an extension to allow for desktop icons? I may be misremembering, it might be a setting somewhere. Either way, I’m sure you can do it.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh yeah there is, it comes with Ubuntu. It’s a bit janky compared to the former native implementation though :(.

    • NeatoBuilds@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Windows works the same way, you just hit the windows key and start typing and you hit enter, made switching to popos much easier because I use it exactly the same way I do with my windows work laptop

      Also You should check out kiss launcher for phone, just start typing and whatever app you want shows up, also has a history list that tries to have apps you use frequently at specific times. Although after using kiss for a few years now whenever I have to use someone’s phone it makes it really hard, seeing all those screens with icons like how can you find anything

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is exactly how I use KDE, but without the GNOME look, which I am not a fan of. You don’t even need to hit meta first in KDE, you can just start typing if you have krunner on.