I like your sentiment, but a two party system inherently uses third party votes as spoilers. It is common for the dominate party to support a third party to peel away votes from their major opposition.

https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

One solution to this is ranked voting. Of course many of our politicians recognize this and have already passed laws at the state level to bar ranked voting under the pretense that it is too confusing for voters.

Someone doesn’t like genocide, geesh.

He is definitely for sale so your assertion would not surprise me in the least.

Why do you think that it is the other way around though?

All that should be preserved and should be easily accessible by the public. Links for past governance should never be removed.

I totally get what you are saying. I think it would be cool to know who actually drafted all these up. It is clear Trump did not. Understanding who is writing these and who is actually calling the shots in the Trump apparatus is paramount to unraveling the truth about what is going on.

I think it is past time to keep pretending the President is the one who makes decisions. It is clear there are a lot of people that the American public does not even know that are the real policy makers.

Yes, yes it is.

He didn’t actually write any of these orders. I am not sure he would even be capable.

The question becomes who did write this order.

Trump decided he wanted to be the first female president obviously. Don’t you liberals understand 5d chess!?

All mass shooters are fascist!? I guess fascism just means “bad” to you now.

Looks like I have got you all wrong mate. You do care about gun violence and human life. You obviously don’t live in some weird revenge fantasy world where all the Nazi are coming to get you.

Crisis actors according to unhonestjim.

I will never forget traveling to the East Coast when I was a teenager and seeing that the other side of the train tracks wasn’t just a saying. There were still restaurants blacks were not welcome at. The racism was palpable.

Just like the thoughts and prayers to all the gun victims.

“If the Negro succumbs to the temptation of using violence in his struggle for justice, unborn generations will be the recipients of a long and desolate night of bitterness, and his chief legacy to the future will be an endless rain of meaningless chaos.”

I heard his words and understood the significance. You pretend he would support a literal genocide on the American people through gun violence. It is sickening really.

That was kind of the whole point of the discussion. Let me catch you up. Moar guns doesn’t solve the problem. Most people that are arguing against this are using some form of a defense fantasy to support their reasoning. They are imagining a threat and then justify their actions based on that imagined threat.

Stop pretending the Nazi are coming to kill you. Stop being played by one side or the other. Start demanding your rights, speak out, and organize with like minded people.

The conservatives have no actual momentum save a bunch of assholes who are ready to trample your rights. They will only get away with what we let them. The solution is to get active not buy guns and hide in your basement.

Ah yes, because reducing gun deaths leads to interment camps. I could only imagine what you would of said about seatbelts back in the day.

Moars guns will not solve our problem is my original statement.

What to do? Regulate heavily and reject gun culture as a mental illness would be the best way to deal with it.

Obviously gun corporations and gun nutters are going to reject this. The question then becomes are we going to let a minority hold our entire civilization hostage so they can make money and play with their toys?

It is very common for a gun nutter to threaten death on people, especially people who talk about regulating guns. This threat of violence is terroristic in nature.

Perhaps properly regulating is not an option due to the ridiculous amount of influence threatening to murder everyone is. This is basically where we are now with politicians to corrupt or scared to do anything.

I have also presented the idea that technology could solve the problem. The Igun from Apple with facial in recognition and a host of safety features that prevent accidental discharge into your family members.

I know gun nutters hate the idea of a smart gun, but this may be the way we actually start reducing our ridiculous amount of gun deaths.

We could also start actually studying the issue. Our government has been cock blocking any research on gun safety for over twenty years now. It is now the number one killer of children, but there was a nothing to see here, riiight?

No, it is just you and your one Ghandi quote saying they were part of it. It is not a quote saying he would never had made it without their violence.

You really should stop pretending you know shit about this. I studied it in college and I don’t feel like I could explain all the complexities of the groups interacting.

It is clear there have been many peaceful movements. Which leads us back to the concept that we need moar guns to solve our problem.

Did moar guns solve Ghandi’s problems? Did moar guns solve Martin Luther King’s problems? Don’t bother answering because these are rhetorical questions.

Guns create problems, they don’t solve them.

Military action is how the Nazi military was defeated. Nazism was never defeated though. You must understand the US was very pro-Nazi before WWII. Wealthy private individuals from the US helped to find the Nazi party.

Later on, after the Nazi rose to power these same US individuals lobbied the governments of Europe and the US not to take the Jews in. The Nazi party originally wanted to expel all the Jews. This lead to the final solution and the murder of millions.

So it is more complex than guns kill Nazi. We were not the good guys in all this. I also think this has little to do with gun proliferation in the US and the lack of regulation causing untold suffering.

No one attributes the success of the movement in freeing India with violence even if it did happen.

You are really reaching trying to prove violence has a purpose. And that purpose is apparently to get you off.

Thanks for proving my point with India despite the nuance. I mean you are really just arguing for violence at this point.

I get it, it is pre-emptive violence to prevent future violence!

Back to the argument that moar guns will solve the problem though. I get it now, more guns equals more violence and random Internet guy frezik likes violence!