With this administration? Uhh, no.

What the hell?

Thanks

Damn, not for the US.

When you start with a conclusion and work your way back to reasons, you almost always end up with odd logic. That’s why good science does it the other way around.

Depends on how you look at it.

I’ve thought about adding him as a filter but I’m afraid I’d stop getting most US news. Even if I don’t want to have any discussions about him, plenty of policy changes and laws are going to be a result of his actions and I will need/want to know about them.

Civil forfeiture has existed for decades. Taking property for themselves hasn’t been the problem.

Don’t think he realizes how problematic it would be for the government to have a stake in any company that actively removes posts. Suddenly they’re forced to allow far more speech than they previously did.

You will live in fear because you’ll never be sure until you read the article.

Look at this guy. He forgot the 5th of November.

Have they fixed their cheating problem?