• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It is impossible to ban piracy. The whole concept is that it’s not legal to begin with.

    I bet Lars Ulrich is so proud that he killed music piracy back when he killed napster.

    Except wait…no he didn’t he killed A service. Meaning singular. The concept of piracy moved on. We got limewire and torrents.

    The ONLY thing that has slowed (if not stopped) music piracy is making the content readily and easily available in a convienent consumption method at a reasonable price.

    Shocking, I know.

    The invention of iTunes CHARGING money for music in a (at the time) new more convienent method of music consumption at a reasonable price did leaps and bounds more to destroy piracy than Napsters downfall ever could.

    Now if only video services would learn this lession. Because it’s the same lession. I don’t know how they missed the memo on this.

    Put your video in one centralized place. Make it hassle free to watch. Charge a reasonable price. Piracy dies overnight.

    And just to prove it, show of hands. Who here would go through the effort and risk of pirating, if Netflix had everything you wanted to watch, for $5 a month? Who here would say no, and still pirate? Reply below and tell me if you would still pirate with those conditions?

    But instead, netflix is pushing $20 a month, and the video hosting is fractured among multiple hosts, all of which overcharge, AND want to serve ads.

    Oh hey, right on cue. It’s a skull and bones flag approaching.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      I gind it kind of ironic that if the streaming services were federated and your subscription applied proportionally to the services where you watched different shows this problem would solve itself

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yep exactly.

      They’ve pushed 6+ services now so it cost that cable used to so people are unsubbing and “cutting the cord” again

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I would still pirate. I like to have the files instead of proprietary apps

      • Eyedust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        Same tbh. I like having a hard data copy of the things I enjoy, and have pride in my offline music library, which has been neatly filed with all the proper metadata tagged on. Now I can boot up Audacious (Linux) or MusicBee (Windows) and pick the genre I’m feeling that day. Or I can go out for a walk with one of the iPods I’ve restored and leave my phone at home.

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Just a subscription that had most of the things and wasn’t a straight up abusive experience would be worth a hell of a lot more than $5. Too bad it will never happen.

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I would pay for the sub, but still seed for my friends in poorer countries where $5 USD is a hell of a lot of money.