This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing
This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing
As noted elsewhere in the thread, this is blatantly untrue.
That was you’re own rambling unsourced interpretation…
And now you’re acting like it’s a source?
6 3 split in the court is an established fact, so I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue. Their other statements were also accurate as far as I can tell.
Edit: Downvote all you like but you’ll still be wrong lol
You are correct, I was referring to the Dems having a majority across all three branches, the judicial branches being one of the big three I’m not sure how it could possibly be irrelevant 🙄
Because no one was talking about SC…
And if we are, then Biden should have expanded it after McTurtle stole Obama’s last seat.
Like, you have to draw the line somewhere, don’t claim that we also have to factor in the Reno County dog catcher now.
Moderates don’t have it in them to fight fascism.
You are incorrect, I was referring to the Dems having a majority across all three branches of government. The judicial branches being one of the big three I’m not sure how it could possibly be irrelevant 🙄
SCOTUS is irrelevant? Really???
Let’s go ahead and ignore that absurd take.
How would he have the means to achieve that?
Why would anyone want to interact with someone acting like this?
It’s a rhetorical question by the way, I’ll never see your response or any other comments you ever make.
k, bye!