• EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    No, this is extremely atypical US imperialism. That’s why the world finds it so shocking. Typical US imperialism is quietly redirecting food aid to support a more US friendly leader taking power, and slipping some arms shipments in as well. Our typical imperialism included strong-arming other world leaders, but only in closed door meetings, followed by shaking hands and smiling with them for the cameras. It was subtly reminding allies that they rely on our militarily might for safety from their more aggressive neighbors, so they owe us support on a global issue. And yes, the more heinous stuff, like assassinations, bribery, supporting coups, and etc. All stuff that’s plausibly deniable, or given a veneer of legitimacy, or just kept unnoticed. By the time any of the awfulness shows through, it’s old news, everyone’s attention has moved on to elsewhere.

    Trump is destroying or fucking up at all of that. He’s taken all the winning hands the US has carefully built up and banked over many years, and thrown them in the trash. Following that, his meeting with Zelensky caught global attention by being blatantly naked imperialism running down the street babbling incoherently. If you’re an enemy of the US, or just someone who’s sick of our shit, you may want to celebrate, because we are currently watching American hegemony disintegrate in real time.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is why Trump is extorting Ukraine. The people of the USA are overwhelmingly in favor of helping Ukraine fight against Putin’s imperialistic invasion.

      • Sphks@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        50-50 is about ending the war or reclaiming lost territories.

        Polls about US support in your link is : “Americans are also split as to whether the U.S. is doing too much (37%), the right amount (31%) or not enough (30%) to aid Ukraine.”

        So 37% : “we should do less/abandon/be against Ukraine”
        and 62% : “we should continue to back up Ukraine”

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          It’s the same question phrased differently. I’d imagine a significant portion of the “right amount” answers don’t have strong feelings either way.

          Regardless, I wouldn’t really consider 62% “overwhelming,” but I guess that"s subjective.

  • Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This whole thing is so silly. It costs hundreds of millions and something like 18 years to build a rare earth mine. What company would be willing to risk that investment without any sort of meaningful security arrangement?