• casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I assume he’s about as much a Muslim as trump is a Christian (ie only when it’s convenient, and he probably doesn’t know what all those words mean in that order, anyway)

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        He converted in 2022 to boost his standing in Dubai with crypto traders

        The funny thing is, Muslims will absolutely discipline their own, and most tend to not like abuse of women, especially how Tate does it. There’s morally allowed abuses of women in some sects, but they have to be seen as justified in some regard - eg rejecting a MARRIAGE proposal might result in an acid attack. A man preying on women to sleep with him, no marriage, like how Tate does it and speaks about it, goes against everything I’m aware of in the Quran and could result in a jihad response afaik (not violent jihad per se).

        He’s just so disrespectful and arrogant he thinks no one will touch him.

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Jihad doesn’t mean punishment. You mean sharia law? Also the acid comment is just absurdly made up. Rejecting a marriage proposal doesn’t justify even verbal abuse, idk what sources you have. Just spouting bs.

              • ansiz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Did I say it’s not a crime? I’m not defending it, I only linked it because it is probably an example of what the other person was referring to.

                • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  Except it’s not an example.

                  There’s morally allowed abuses of women in some sects, but they have to be seen as justified in some regard - eg rejecting a MARRIAGE proposal might result in an acid attack

                  You don’t have to say everything, it’s implied. You chimed into the conversation with a useless example no one asked for. Could you have also read what you linked and understood if it’s irrelevant, but you dont cause it doesnt fit with your muslims=bad narrative. Fk off.

                  • ansiz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Oh pardon me for chiming into your conversation on a public forum! Get over yourself, you act like you’re interested in a conversation but all you want is confirmation of what your already think.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I definitely get that vibe from that headline. It’s not that the US reached out and said “touch not one hair on my precious scumbags”, it’s that they did it for someone who scumbags who also claim to be Muslim and fail the melanin deficiency test.