This is the most unhinged of Lemmy.

Interesting, I didn’t see that earlier. That definitely raises a barrier.

Which is hilarious because that’s the exact system we’re watching fail so horribly on other platforms.

Then you’ve fallen for this bit of misinformation too. I already submitted a screenshot showing that searches critical of Trump are actually still working. They found one specific phrase tied to a conspiracy theory. That’s it.

And I’d like to know where in the law this appeals court remedy is mentioned as I did not see that.

Our top line numbers may look good but there’s real problems under the hood. Our homelessness is the highest it’s been since we started tracking it and food has increased in price much farther than most people’s wages. It’s not about the gross amount of money. It’s about what that money can buy. And the answer is increasingly, not much.

You should really go read the law instead of the marketing they used. There is no requirement for fact finding. It’s an executive decision. That’s it. The President’s guy declares your company to be a foreign adversary controlled social media company and that’s it. Sell or shut down.

That’s technically true, but he’s still going to have the same speaking patterns. Crying chicken little because he did an old man isn’t in good faith.

That’s quite a leap. And in reality all social media is on the block with that law. It’s an executive declaration. No court, no hearing, no due process. Just a declaration and you have to sell or shut down. So is the entire Internet now a propaganda arm of the US government?

They absolutely should be helping to stop the spread of misinformation. We rag on Social Media for amplifying misinformation all the time and now suddenly it’s a bad thing to stop it?

Because they decided to actually try responsibility?

Like I said it’s nonsensical. Supposedly a special starlink satellite was used. Which makes as much sense as saying a special router was used.

No, the article says if you misspell something it goes past the filters.

At a certain point an 80 year old man is just an 80 year old man.

I mean it was “fixed” because they got embarrassed.

That’s where I am too. That’s why I’m confused. The Articles of Confederation failed horribly.

If they ignore election results then they’re illegitimate and the country is free to descend into chaos.

Because there’s a conspiracy theory that Trump rigged the 2024 elections because Star Link. Which is nonsensical to anyone with a knowledge of networking.

The article also goes on to make broader claims though which my screenshot disproves are even happening.

But that’s the claim the article is making. If the article was asking why one search phrase was stopped then sure. But I made those other searches because the article specifically claims Fuck Trump is unsearchable and broadly claims you can’t search anti Trump stuff. This is directly disproven.

And Trump’s remarks are no different than any other 80 year old talking about how their grand kid is good with the computers because they deleted the 15 browser bars dragging the system down.

I don’t care if you downvote me, I’m not going to stop speaking truth.

Great. Don’t engage then. But somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of Americans use the app. It’s fate is national news.

No, but they always claimed it was.