You can have elections and still be authoritan, if you also have a solid spoonful of political repression. (HINT: shooting protesters and closing news providers is repression)

I mean, it’s literally an apartheid state. In what world do you live in?

They shot and killed protesters in 2024. In any case, that isn’t the deciding factor when considering if something is fascistic or not.

The term is fine. Your examples are very selective. I doubt Joe Schmo thought the aimbots in CoD were truly intelligent when he referred to them as AI.

It’s a bit weird to be blaming the guy at the lever for the deaths, no? The dems literally decided to tie people up in front of that train, but they aren’t to blame because they tied less people then the republicans. Instead of demanding change, we are guilt tripping voters.

It’s a shame the article doesn’t mention the most important part; deepseeks new model was released with an MIT license. It’s the first open model that punches above what openai has to offer.

LLMs demonstrated greater accuracy when addressing questions about ancient history, particularly between 8,000 BCE and 3,000 BCE, but struggled with more recent events, especially from 1,500 CE to the present.

I’m not entirely surprised by this. Llms are trained on the whole internet and not just the good part. There are groups online that are very vocal about things like the confederates being in the right for example. It would make sense to assume this essentially poisons the datasets. Realistically, no one is contesting history before that time.

Not that it isn’t a problem and doesn’t need fixing, just that it makes “sense”.

The colors and it looks like a child’s drawing, which is fun.

Kokoro 82m, but it’s fairly new. It’s very quick tho, and the quality is acceptable (not elven labs quality but not too far off). There’s multiple voices, some are better then others.

I kind of dig the icon but yes, the banner is simply awful.

Doesn’t say so in the Bible though, tough luck.