That sounds like a terrible idea honestly.

When was GN proven wrong and did they at least admit they where wrong? Everybody gets things wrong, it’s how often you’re wrong and how you handle being wrong that matters.

Not being held legally liable ≠ Nothing happened

Afaik the report that was done was not made public. If one side paid for the investigation and controls all the info in said investigation then it can’t be used as proof of innocence.

The firm also has its own reputation to consider, and wouldn’t let a client get away with materially misrepresenting their results.

Meaning what? What would the company doing the investigation do is if the claims that someone said:

I was asked about my sexual history, my boyfriends sexual history, “how I liked to fuck”.

I was asked to twerk for a co-worker at one point.

I was told I was chunky, fat, ugly, stupid. I was called “retarded” I was called a "removed

Where true? How would one even prove that actually happened to them? The Investigation Company surely signed an NDA and had no legal ability to release any info found in says investigation right? If they started releasing info that accusations where in fact true they would lose all their business immediately right?

https://lemmy.zip/comment/13100245

Here’s a quick roundup of some, but not all of the issues people have with LTT.

A former LTT employee made claims of sexual harassment and poor working environment. LTT paid a third party to investigate those claims and unsurprisingly didn’t find evidence that supported those claims. A lot of LTT stans use this as “evidence” that the accuser was lying. Assuming that is clearly false logic, investigating yourself isn’t proof of innocence.