If the rich were all in on Trump, one must suspect that the dems would have a much harder time fundraising whenever elections come around.
If the rich were all in on Trump, one must suspect that the dems would have a much harder time fundraising whenever elections come around.
Something that occurred to me this morning is that its a bit worse than just them sucking up to Trump with that to get unbanned; to my understanding, he’s just stated he wont enforce the ban law, so if he was to change his mind, he wouldnt need congress to pass another I dont think? He’d just need to start enforcing the existing one. That means that TikTok has a strong incentive to continue sucking up to him throughout his whole term, to stay on his good side. But it goes further, because it also creates an incentive for other corporate social medias that compete with TikTok to do the same (though admittedly, their owners seem to want to anyway), in the hopes that they can convince him to enforce the ban again and remove some of their competition.
If they get to the point of being able to just ignore something like that, they have no reason to amend the constitution anyway because they can just toss it out