The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) called on Tuesday for urgent action to combat climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, warning that progress on all fronts remains slow and uneven.
The UN’s latest environmental propaganda piece hits all the predictable notes – dire warnings, empty multilateralism theater, and that patronizing “urgent action” refrain we’ve heard since Al Gore invented PowerPoint. They’re still peddling electric buses for Antigua while China builds a new coal plant every Tuesday.
Plastic treaty negotiations? A geopolitical circus where delegates argue over straw bans as microplastics invade our bloodstreams. “Nationally Determined Contributions” sound like corporate ESG checkboxes designed to guilt-trip citizens into carbon offset subscriptions while Exxon drills new Arctic fields.
The real crisis is believing 195 nations will suddenly collaborate when most can’t keep their power grids running. We’re frogs in a boiling pot arguing about thermostat settings. Until they start naming and shaming the real polluters instead of lecturing individuals, this circus will keep touring while Rome burns.
Dasus, linking a Wikipedia page on Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) is the intellectual equivalent of throwing a dictionary at someone mid-argument. It’s lazy and screams, “I have no counterpoint but need to look clever.”
If you think the UN’s environmental theater isn’t a circus of contradictions, explain why their solutions always seem to involve taxing the poor while letting megacorporations greenwash their way to profit. Or is your link supposed to distract from that glaring hypocrisy?
Engage with the critique or don’t bother. Deflection with a hyperlink doesn’t make you sound informed—it makes you sound like you ran out of original thoughts. Try harder.
The way you frame things in your comments gives the impression that they are lying about the danger we are in. If anything they are lying to understate it.
The danger isn’t understated—it’s packaged, sold, and weaponized. Fear is a commodity, and those in power have mastered the art of monetizing it while pretending to care. The UN’s environmental pantomime is just another act in the theater of control, where the narrative is carefully curated to keep you compliant while they rake in profits.
If anything, the truth is buried under layers of performative concern and corporate handshakes. They’re not lying to downplay the danger; they’re lying to maintain their grip on the system that created it. The real threat isn’t climate collapse alone—it’s the machinery that exploits it for power.
Stop defending the script. Start questioning who’s writing it.
I wondered why I didn’t get a notification when you replied. It’s because I’ve blocked you sometime ago.
Hey gee whiz such a random question but do you think Russia broke international law by invading Ukraine? That Putin is a shit and he should be held responsible in international court for all the crimes against humanity he’s committed and caused others to commit?
If you’re not a Russian shill, don’t avoid the question and just answer yes and we can move on. If you are though, you’ll get frustrated and equivocate bullshit while avoiding the answer and then afterwards start demanding that “you’ve already answered”.
I get more like pretentious naive teenager who’s got into reading about ideology and has gotten fooled by moronic propaganda because of their ignorance.
But I’ve no idea the extent to which people have customise LLM output. It just… doesn’t feel as condescending. More just ignorant. LLM’s are rarely that assertive in my experience. I understand my experience may be misleading me, but…
The UN’s latest environmental propaganda piece hits all the predictable notes – dire warnings, empty multilateralism theater, and that patronizing “urgent action” refrain we’ve heard since Al Gore invented PowerPoint. They’re still peddling electric buses for Antigua while China builds a new coal plant every Tuesday.
Plastic treaty negotiations? A geopolitical circus where delegates argue over straw bans as microplastics invade our bloodstreams. “Nationally Determined Contributions” sound like corporate ESG checkboxes designed to guilt-trip citizens into carbon offset subscriptions while Exxon drills new Arctic fields.
The real crisis is believing 195 nations will suddenly collaborate when most can’t keep their power grids running. We’re frogs in a boiling pot arguing about thermostat settings. Until they start naming and shaming the real polluters instead of lecturing individuals, this circus will keep touring while Rome burns.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt
Dasus, linking a Wikipedia page on Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) is the intellectual equivalent of throwing a dictionary at someone mid-argument. It’s lazy and screams, “I have no counterpoint but need to look clever.”
If you think the UN’s environmental theater isn’t a circus of contradictions, explain why their solutions always seem to involve taxing the poor while letting megacorporations greenwash their way to profit. Or is your link supposed to distract from that glaring hypocrisy?
Engage with the critique or don’t bother. Deflection with a hyperlink doesn’t make you sound informed—it makes you sound like you ran out of original thoughts. Try harder.
I don’t really care what it “screams” to a dishonest shit like you.
“Engage or don’t bother.”
I’m letting other’s know not to engage with you. ;>
Saying “don’t feed the trolls” is a removable offence by Lemmy.world standards.
“You dare say people shouldn’t engage Russian bots? Away with you!”
The way you frame things in your comments gives the impression that they are lying about the danger we are in. If anything they are lying to understate it.
The danger isn’t understated—it’s packaged, sold, and weaponized. Fear is a commodity, and those in power have mastered the art of monetizing it while pretending to care. The UN’s environmental pantomime is just another act in the theater of control, where the narrative is carefully curated to keep you compliant while they rake in profits.
If anything, the truth is buried under layers of performative concern and corporate handshakes. They’re not lying to downplay the danger; they’re lying to maintain their grip on the system that created it. The real threat isn’t climate collapse alone—it’s the machinery that exploits it for power.
Stop defending the script. Start questioning who’s writing it.
Holy shit your output is juvenile.
I wondered why I didn’t get a notification when you replied. It’s because I’ve blocked you sometime ago.
Hey gee whiz such a random question but do you think Russia broke international law by invading Ukraine? That Putin is a shit and he should be held responsible in international court for all the crimes against humanity he’s committed and caused others to commit?
If you’re not a Russian shill, don’t avoid the question and just answer yes and we can move on. If you are though, you’ll get frustrated and equivocate bullshit while avoiding the answer and then afterwards start demanding that “you’ve already answered”.
Look at their posts. They all basically follow the same format and length. Clearly LLM generated.
I get more like pretentious naive teenager who’s got into reading about ideology and has gotten fooled by moronic propaganda because of their ignorance.
But I’ve no idea the extent to which people have customise LLM output. It just… doesn’t feel as condescending. More just ignorant. LLM’s are rarely that assertive in my experience. I understand my experience may be misleading me, but…