• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        TikTok are not competition, they don’t even care about profit or they would have sold 80% of ownership and would continue operating legally.

        They’re a weapon

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          The same can be said for Meta and X. They even stopped moderating them. So why shall we ban TikTok and allow Meta and X to continue working? I am up for greater scrutiny of social media, but one that’s applied equally across all platforms.

  • arbitrary_sarcasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don’t take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.

    • ramirezmike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      they can’t really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can’t just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        When in practice Corruption is not investigated or prosecuted, nobody ever gets convicted of Corruption, the Media can’t talk about Corruption as it would otherwise be defamation, hence the country has no Corruption.

        I haven’t lived in the US but I lived in the UK and this was exactly how Britain had “no Corruption”.