• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s interesting to see people who either weren’t educated on a topic or maybe didn’t really grasp its usefulness converge on the same solution.

      I wonder if this author continued developing this method or if they were pointed towards some calculus and statistics textbooks after sharing this paper.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Because inevitably, someone is gonna say it, I will take it upon myself to be that guy.

    *ahem*...

    x = 3

    • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is exactly the type of simple equation that always drove me nuts in school. I could take one look at that and my brain fucking just knows the answer. It takes me like 10 times as long to write it down to show my work (not that it is hard here, but my brain does not supply that part by default.) This is why I had to re-take Algebra 2. The way they made us do things just didn’t work for my brain. When it does work, math can be fun, but usually the our teachers taught it made everything super dull. Maybe when my kids get there, they can teach me the new ways.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    math is pervasive and inevitable.

    the only people that can escape it in their professional lives are republican politicians.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I like math quite a lot, but I don’t really use it in my job as a language teacher. I guess there’s a small amount of addition and division in grading, but there are also programs that automatically do that for you.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Nah, I teach adult immigrants, so if they don’t show up, that’s their business. As for time, I don’t know that I really consider that math.

          Either way, counting and time are two things that republicans politicians also have to do, tallying up the votes in congress and figuring out exactly how long they can draw that process out. At some point, I suspect they’ll give up vote tallying, but we’re not there quite yet.

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I wish I could say I’m not an engineer but I become the de-facto engineer and IT technician at every place I work 🤦‍♀️

        I’m also flattered though. :]

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Oh, IT adjacent areas are still full of math.

          If you ever get curious, electrical engineering has lots and lots of convoluted procedures one can learn to avoid even more math… And civil engineering has a very cool “I can beat math with brute force and linear approximations all day long!” philosophy that could improve the lives of most people.

          • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I have heard of this mystical engineering technique called “looking it up in a table” by which one avoids copious amounts of math

  • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    molecular biologists rolling their eyes

    And on a more serious note, considering how much of science is doing admin, attempting to get grants, and data science, almost every scientist is very, intimately familiar with maths.

    • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      data science

      Oh god, just imagining having to tweak the spectroscopy algorithms again in R has me whimpering.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      My experiences have led me to believe the type of math someone is good at depends on their field (or what math they use regularly).

      Some biologists are excellent statisticians, far better than me. I’ve also learned to never trust those same biologists with unit conversions that a chemist would consider incredibly simple.