JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agodotnet developerprogramming.devimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imagedotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareOneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSorry, what’s .Net again? The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore? Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
minus-squareTrailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago Can’t call it Windows 9 But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility. For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
minus-squareXTornado@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).
Sorry, what’s .Net again?
The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore?
Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility.
For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).