I don’t understand how they are supposed to “sell your data” if you just never use a Mozilla account and uncheck all the telemetry. Its not like they can secretly steal your data, since its Open Source.

It seems to me like just more FUD that Google is spreading to undermine our trust in free software.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah, its definitely wide open for abuse now. But the California law also seems way too vague as well. What about DNS lookup? That takes a users input and transfers it to someone else, is that a “sale”? Can hardly start separating that out of the browser? Http requests? Its all users initiated, but is it a “sale” in California? Not a lawyer, haven’t a clue.

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      DNS is fine as the exchange has to be for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration” to be considered a sale. The issue seems to be that Mozilla were profiting off of things like adverts placed on the new tab page, and possibly from the translation service too.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m not a lawyer, but “other valuable consideration” seems very broad. For DNS, getting the returned IP address is valuable. Ditto for http, getting the returned webpage is valuable?

        I only suggested the translation thing because it (imo) fell under a “transfer of data for value provided”, which makes it a sale?