• JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t matter if it’s accurate or not as long as pedos can get off to it, so just keep going until they can. According to our definition of what a pedophile is, though, it would likely be accurate.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Probably not, but that’s irrelevant. The point is that no one needs to harm a child to find out if the output is sufficiently arousing.

          • DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            But how does it get more authentic without actual input if what’s accurate.

            It’s not enough to tell and AI that’s somethings wrong. You have to also tell it what was right.

            • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It doesn’t need to get more authentic, it just needs to get more arousing, and we have a perfectly ethical way to measure that. You tell the AI it was “right” if the pedos you show it to get aroused.