You know the funniest thing about people arguing about this with you? If you had watched Falcon and the Winter Soldier, which I guess these people didn’t, you’d know that it starts out with him not being Captain America. He literally gives the shield up and because he doesn’t want to be Captain America. So the argument that he became Captain America because of the scene at the end of end game is literally not true. He wasn’t Captain America because of that scene he was Captain America because of the choices he makes at the end of the show.
If you didn’t watch the show, you don’t know Sam gave up the shield. You see him get the shield in Endgame, Steve tells him it suits him, then in the next movie, everybody calls him Cap. What do you need here? A connect-the-dot game? A coloring book?
So I’m confused your argument here is that if you don’t know what happened then you don’t know you’re wrong? What a silly line of reasoning. Imagine tying yourself into this kind of knot to defend the writing of a Marvel film. Lol.
I don’t think you know what your argument is. Someone who didn’t watch the show wouldn’t notice that something happened, the connection fits. You are using your knowledge of the show to point out that this connection is not the straight line it seems to be, but that’s not relevant, it doesn’t matter to the 2 movies. It’ll matter in Thunderbolts with John’s own story, but not here. The show is extra information with its own story, which is nice, but it’s not critical.
Imagine working so hard to find a plot hole in something you hate. You’re overthinking things.
My only argument was that it was silly you people were getting all bent out of shape about something when your point was literally the opposite of the reality. The scene in end game is not Sam becoming Captain America. You’re making bad faith arguments. Which is funny. That’s the only argument I ever made. Your comments have just compounded the silliness of the situation.
Also never even suggested I hated the shows. So don’t know where you pulled that straw man out of.
To be fair, you’re commenting all over this thread. I was genuinely interested in why one message wouldn’t have your little copy paste, if there was any significance in that. I do think the whole thing is silly, but it was genuine curiosity.
To be fair, you’re commenting all over this thread.
Well I only license label my content when it’s actually content from me, and not me simply replying to a question with an answer. At least that’s my general rule that I try to use.
But honestly, I tend to think you’re more backtracking than being honest about your reasons why you made your initial comment to me, considering you made it at the same time I’m having a heated discussion with others about my use of a license on another post. If I’m wrong in that, you have my apologies.
But it did seem a little creepy for you to make that comment, considering it has nothing to do with the subject being discussed. I mean, you could always just let it go, and not comment on it in the first place. /shrug
Well, what in this comment do you consider content? I don’t understand why the comment you’ve made here is more “content” than answering a question.
Check my history and you’ll see I’m also engaging with, and actually being WAYYYYY meaner to, the guy that was being a dick to you. Kinda embarrassed him tbh.
I don’t see why you would think it’s creepy. It’s not like I’m personally interested in you or your life. I just wondered why you seemed to be inconsistent about it.
Well, what in this comment do you consider content?
I consider most of what I type as content that I create. But if its a very simple phrase, like “thank you”, something like that, I won’t bother with the link, because I also declare everything that I post/command is covered by the same license in my user account information.
And I do appreciate the defence, truly. I just wish I didn’t have to talk/type so much about the license/link, vs being able to talk about the subjects that I am commenting in/on instead. Its why I keep referring people to my comment history, if they are being intellectually honest and have an honest curiosity as to why I do it, so that I can talk about the subject at hand instead of CC licenses usage.
You know the funniest thing about people arguing about this with you? If you had watched Falcon and the Winter Soldier, which I guess these people didn’t, you’d know that it starts out with him not being Captain America. He literally gives the shield up and because he doesn’t want to be Captain America. So the argument that he became Captain America because of the scene at the end of end game is literally not true. He wasn’t Captain America because of that scene he was Captain America because of the choices he makes at the end of the show.
If you didn’t watch the show, you don’t know Sam gave up the shield. You see him get the shield in Endgame, Steve tells him it suits him, then in the next movie, everybody calls him Cap. What do you need here? A connect-the-dot game? A coloring book?
So I’m confused your argument here is that if you don’t know what happened then you don’t know you’re wrong? What a silly line of reasoning. Imagine tying yourself into this kind of knot to defend the writing of a Marvel film. Lol.
I don’t think you know what your argument is. Someone who didn’t watch the show wouldn’t notice that something happened, the connection fits. You are using your knowledge of the show to point out that this connection is not the straight line it seems to be, but that’s not relevant, it doesn’t matter to the 2 movies. It’ll matter in Thunderbolts with John’s own story, but not here. The show is extra information with its own story, which is nice, but it’s not critical.
Imagine working so hard to find a plot hole in something you hate. You’re overthinking things.
My only argument was that it was silly you people were getting all bent out of shape about something when your point was literally the opposite of the reality. The scene in end game is not Sam becoming Captain America. You’re making bad faith arguments. Which is funny. That’s the only argument I ever made. Your comments have just compounded the silliness of the situation.
Also never even suggested I hated the shows. So don’t know where you pulled that straw man out of.
Yep. Its just astroturfers being overly sensitive and defensive, since the movie has opened recently.
Is this comment not under the license?
Um, are you literally following me around, checking my comments?
I’m sorry to have disappointed you by not adding a licensing link to my comment that you replied to. Didn’t realize you needed that in your life.
Don’t worry though, I got you covered. Sleep well, little one, sleep well. …
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
To be fair, you’re commenting all over this thread. I was genuinely interested in why one message wouldn’t have your little copy paste, if there was any significance in that. I do think the whole thing is silly, but it was genuine curiosity.
Well I only license label my content when it’s actually content from me, and not me simply replying to a question with an answer. At least that’s my general rule that I try to use.
But honestly, I tend to think you’re more backtracking than being honest about your reasons why you made your initial comment to me, considering you made it at the same time I’m having a heated discussion with others about my use of a license on another post. If I’m wrong in that, you have my apologies.
But it did seem a little creepy for you to make that comment, considering it has nothing to do with the subject being discussed. I mean, you could always just let it go, and not comment on it in the first place. /shrug
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Well, what in this comment do you consider content? I don’t understand why the comment you’ve made here is more “content” than answering a question.
Check my history and you’ll see I’m also engaging with, and actually being WAYYYYY meaner to, the guy that was being a dick to you. Kinda embarrassed him tbh.
I don’t see why you would think it’s creepy. It’s not like I’m personally interested in you or your life. I just wondered why you seemed to be inconsistent about it.
I consider most of what I type as content that I create. But if its a very simple phrase, like “thank you”, something like that, I won’t bother with the link, because I also declare everything that I post/command is covered by the same license in my user account information.
And I do appreciate the defence, truly. I just wish I didn’t have to talk/type so much about the license/link, vs being able to talk about the subjects that I am commenting in/on instead. Its why I keep referring people to my comment history, if they are being intellectually honest and have an honest curiosity as to why I do it, so that I can talk about the subject at hand instead of CC licenses usage.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0