I’m trying to figure out a ruling for something one of my players wants to do. They’re invisible, but they took a couple of seemingly non-attack actions that my gut says should break inviz.

Specifically, they dumped out a flask of oil, and then used a tinderbox to light it on fire. Using a tinderbox isn’t an attack, nor is emptying a flask, although they are actions , and the result of lighting something on fire both seems like an attack and something that would dispell inviz.

I know that as DM I can rule it however I want, but I’m fairly inexperienced and I don’t wanna go nerfing one of my players tools just because it feels yucky to me personally without understanding the implications.

Is this an attack or is there another justification for breaking inviz that is there some RAW clause I didn’t see? Or should this be allowed?

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I would allow it. The damage is terrible compared to actual attacks, the enemies can figure it out, and it’s slow.

    Let them have the win until it’s underpowered in a few levels. It’s fun to figure out a cool combo, and you can just make the game harder.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It wasn’t actually attacking an enemy, it was setting their weapon rack on fire so that they couldn’t get to their ranged weapons.

      Very clever, I like it!

      But this familiar is becoming OP through rules lawyering. I don’t wanna rain on my player’s parade, but I’m not an experienced DM and it’s becoming difficult to make encounters that can’t just be circumvented by this damn familiar lol.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Add some environmental hazards and AoE attacks. Make the fires spread out of control and become a threat of their own. Tempt them with explosive barrels in dangerous places. Familiars die easily, but are cheap to resummon.

        Keep attacking them frequently between rests. Make them reconsider that 1 hour familiar ritual and invisibility spell slot.

        If even a single witness escapes, he’s telling everyone what happened. Most spell casters can immediately put out the fire with Prestidigitation, Control Flames, or Druidcraft.

        When they destroy items with fire, describe expensive things melting into worthless things.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Their familiar is an imp, so it gets invisibility as an action, so it doesn’t cost them a spell slot or any spell uses. The familiar is basically always invisible and flying. I do need to pay more attention to how it’s flying, though - it needs to be shape shifted into a raven, so polymorphing would break concentration, and raven flight isn’t silent and cannot hover. Thanks for making me take a deeper look here. Edit: oh wait, imps can fly without shapeshifting

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Does that mean they took Pact of the Chain? If so, then it’s a class feature that’s supposed to be powerful. Maybe this signature trick makes their patron impressed, jealous, or bored…

            They passed up on Pact of the Blade, so when they do get attacked, they’re more vulnerable.