• errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Problem is I don’t see any person in military doing this. They’re been brainwashed to love their country and their president since birth.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Well, yeah. When you’re planning a military coup against a fascist regime you don’t announce it ahead of time.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      23 hours ago

      and their president

      During training we are very specifically taught that nothing is above the constitution, including the president. We are obligated to refuse illegal orders.

      If it stuck with me, hopefully it stuck with a few of the people still in service.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Isn’t a large part of the federal workforce veterans? I can’t imagine active service members have good feelings about Trump kicking them to the curb

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If it stuck with me, hopefully it stuck with a few of the people still in service.

        apparently not… it’s alredy happening and the entire rrction have been tears and bending over

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Refusing illegal orders is something that always sounds good, but never goes well even when it rarely happens in real life. Otherwise the crazy numerous war crimes and illegal things the air force kidnapping citizens human trafficked and abused by ICE because they are brown and “might be illegal” wouldn’t happen.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Not to discredit what he did because he was probably one of the biggest impact decisions taken ever, he is definitely a great man and he deserves every ounce of credit, but he did not defy orders. They received no orders whatsoever, and the captain just assumed a war had broken out. They were too deep to receive orders at all. He refused to give his permission which was “legally” (military law-wise?) needed to launch the nukes. From your own link (also he wasn’t a commander at the time):

            Unlike other Soviet submarines armed with the “special weapon”, where only the captain and the political officer were required to authorize a nuclear launch, three officers on board the B-59 were required to authorize the launch because Arkhipov was also the chief of staff of the brigade (not the commander as is often incorrectly reported, who was in fact Captain First Rank Vasili Naumovich Agafonov).[11][12] The three men were Captain Savitsky, Political Officer Ivan Semyonovich Maslennikov, and Executive Officer Arkhipov. An argument broke out among the three of them, with only Arkhipov against the launch.

            So it doesn’t really apply. It is more one of 3 commanding officers that had a big disagreement and one of them refused to let the others give the order.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I have zero special knowledge, but generic history would suggest that at least some in the officer class, regardless of political leaning, will not be down with the current trajectory.

      no idea what this may look like, but my worthless analysis portends something brewing ahead and it may be wise to consider possibilities and prep accordingly. fuck these “interesting times”.