• Camzing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      In 2018, the U.S. Code was about 60,000 pages long and contained 54 volumes. How is he going to run a country when he has to interpret all of that.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of these days you would think one of the other powerful people in one of the other branches of government would get upset at this stuff.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is KY available at the government office or do I need to bring it with me to see Mr government?

    Also, could Mr.Government please do the DMV too? Fuck it up real good for all of us please! Fire everyone who works there, delete the data, etc. I mean “fix it” real good for us please!

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tell me about it. Every time I bring up Trump and all the damage he’s doing to the country outside of social media, people look at me like I’m a raving lunatic. Most Americans literally have no clue what’s happening.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    He has already shown himself completely unqualified to interpret or follow laws.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is this enough of a coup for a general strike yet? Or are you still waiting to see how it pans out?

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, my understanding was prior to 1984 if a law was unclear, the courts would get involved and clarify. However, sometimes the courts wanted something that the writers of the law didn’t want, and that thing was different from the current congress, which in of itself different from what the president wanted, which even could be different from what the independent executive branch department heads wanted.

    This all came to a head with Chevron. In Chevron, anything unclear in a congressional law that applied to a executive branch’s mission was left up to the head of that department which in a way was controlled by who the president nominated. In that way, if congress left something vague that meant the courts, congress, and the president all agreed that the head of the particular department in the executive branch got to decide it.

    This peace lasted up until Loper in the end of 2024 under Biden. In it, the Supreme court said basically “If something is unclear, it is the courts and not the executive branch” that got to interpret the law. Not wanting to overturn 40 years of regulation, the courts said “anything made under Chevron is still good, but that stops now”, most likely since they thought Biden was going to win again and they wanted to take away his power.

    Now this EO is saying “No, lol, Loper doesn’t mater. No one but the president himself (and DOGE) can interpret the law.” At least both Loper and Trump agree that THE REGULATORS can’t make new regulations. And because SCOTUS didn’t really want that job, and Trump doesn’t want to do anything, don’t expect any new regulations for the next 4 years.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      My guess is that the reason they bothered with this, rather than leaving it with the courts, is that this version would allow Trump to abruptly reverse the things that were previously decided under Chevron deference.