Summary

Oxfam’s 2024 inequality report revealed a record $2 trillion increase in billionaire wealth, reaching $15 trillion, while global poverty rates remain stagnant.

The top 1% own 45% of all wealth, and 44% of people live on less than $6.85 daily.

Oxfam predicts five trillionaires within a decade, citing inheritance and cronyism as key wealth drivers. Elon Musk may become the first trillionaire by 2027.

Oxfam calls for tax reform, monopoly regulation, and income redistribution to address inequality.

Critics warn unchecked wealth concentration threatens democracy and economic fairness.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Public trillionaires

    Trillionaires almost certainly already exist. There are many people and families who do not publicly report their net worth. Putin is a good example.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The fact that we even have billionaires (and they should not be a thing. The notion of a trillionaire is even more fucking atrocious) is probably why donvict and elon are assuming power right now.

    Without the broligarchs and their thumb heavily on media, both “legacy” and not, do you think there would be so very many stupid people willing to vote for the convicted felon?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Every developed nation should tax these motherfuckers’ entire assets at 99%. If they want to flee with all of their money to Honduras or Haiti or something, let them enjoy that paradise.

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean, the issue is getting all nations to agree to that and making any agreement binding because otherwise the nation that decides to tax them at 98% gets all of the tax revenue…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’d be fine with just taking them out of the entire system. Like I said, let them live in a place like Haiti if they want to be rich and keep them out of the rest of our lives. Let them build themselves a Dracula castle in Port-au-Prince.

        • gnutrino@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          They’re not going to go to Haiti though, they’re going to go to Monaco or Switzerland or Ireland or The Netherlands. That’s my point, for this to work all of the “developed” nations need to agree despite having a massive financial incentive not to.

            • gnutrino@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Because, as I said, if they instead tax 98% of their wealth then all the billionaires will move there and they’ll get 98% of a lot more while everyone else gets 99% of nothing. Until a country works out they could get 97% of all that wealth to themselves and so on and so forth until you get down to the sort of tax levels we actually see. It’s just basic game theory in the end.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                Billionaires aren’t going to move to those other countries. The whole point of their lives is to flex their wealth where the other rich people are. If they did decide to leave the US for some reason then tax the shit out of any stock trades they make on the NYSE. Hike their corporate tax rate on any transaction with US citizens. Freeze their assets if they don’t pay what they owe. There are lots of ways to do this we’re just too chicken shit to go down that road.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        98% of… what? Billionaires don’t get a paycheck like working people. They’re already sitting on all that wealth! If they spend money, it’s buying something once like a football team or Twitter and waiting until the value goes up before selling it. Same thing with stocks. And those realized gains are taxed lower than payroll taxes. They even take out unneeded loans like Trump just to avoid paying taxes! There’s a reason people say the rich pay less taxes than us…

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    When money is used in society as security for basic rights like a home, food and clean water, healthcare, political representation in government, then people hoarding wealth at the detriment of others are responsible and shouldn’t be surprised when those same people they oppress become violent.

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    These are direct results of the government’s failure to govern. The whole purpose of government is to regulate.

    Billionaire wealth should have immediately been taxed at the highest historical levels. Now we’re past the tipping point and have to simply endure living in an empire as it crumbles around us, while masses of rubes cheer their oppressors.

    • italics2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      ‘Now we’re past the tipping point and have to simply endure living in an empire as it crumbles around us, while masses of rubes cheer their oppressors.’ - I can still vote and will do everything in my power to tax the s**t out of those billionairs. So help me the flying spaghetti monster.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Simple farmers, people of the land, the common clay of the new west…you know, morons.

            More seriously:

            rube (noun): a country bumpkin

            bumpkin (noun): an unsophisticated or socially awkward person from the countryside

            ‘rube’ also has the connotation of someone being taken advantage of or otherwise fooled