• LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hearing about this 4 days before it was going to happen just seems like poor planning…

    You need a solid month at the very minimum if you really want people to see, prepare, and be there…

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wonder if it would make more sense for people to make appointments at their nearest firing range, for basic firearm safety training. Just, you know, in case a burglar burgles a home or something. If the government saw that 10,000 people went for training this weekend, they’d feel better about our safety. And more could join in next weekend.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is important, don’t get me wrong, but most people can’t drive to bum-fuck for a protest. Most US State capitals are in the middle of nowhere purposefully. Props to all the organizers getting stuff like this off the ground. We need more material means of dissent.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also in the middle of the week and people have jobs so they can do stuff like keep a roof over their heads.

      Yes a weekend would be less disruptive. But there would also be a hell of a lot more people able to participate.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Many people have expressed this concern and it does make sense i.m.o. Other people have said that, to be disruptive, a protest taking place when lawmakers are in their offices is a good idea … so they will experience the protest first hand. (a little like what happened during the January 6th insurrection i should try to find a better example)
        Some people will not be able to attend but this might be just one group of (50) protests in an escalation of many more …